How Much Evidence Is Needed to Establish the Foundation for the Use of the Co-conspirators’ Exception to the Hearsay Rule?

dc.creatorSquyres, B. Newal, Jr.
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-14T18:29:10Z
dc.date.available2018-09-14T18:29:10Z
dc.date.issued1970
dc.description.abstractThis article looks to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals case White v. State. In White, a co-conspirator’s out-of-court statements were used against defendant White through the co-conspirator’s exception to the hearsay rule. The only evidence of this conspiracy was the statement itself. On this basis, the court reversed the trial court’s conviction of White. This established the co-conspirator’s hearsay exception foundation requirement, stating that there must be evidence of a conspiracy that is independent of the potential hearsay evidence. The author questions, what is the standard for this independent evidence?en_US
dc.identifier.citation2 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 121 (1970)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2346/74564
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectHearsayen_US
dc.subjectCo-conspiratoren_US
dc.subjectHearsay exceptionen_US
dc.subjectCo-conspirators’ hearsay exception ruleen_US
dc.subjectWhite v. Stateen_US
dc.subjectCase noteen_US
dc.titleHow Much Evidence Is Needed to Establish the Foundation for the Use of the Co-conspirators’ Exception to the Hearsay Rule?en_US
dc.title.alternativeEvidence—Hearsay—Co-conspirator’s Exception—How Much Evidence Is Needed to Establish the Foundation for the Use of the Co-conspirators’ Exception to the Hearsay Rule?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
17_2TexTechLRev121(1970-1971).pdf
Size:
392.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: