2024-06-232024-06-232024-07-21ICES-2024-156https://hdl.handle.net/2346/98855Thomas T. Chen, NASA Johnson Space Center(JSC), USAICES300: ECLSS Modeling and Test CorrelationsThe 53rd International Conference on Environmental Systems was held in Louisville, Kentucky, USA, on 21 July 2024 through 25 July 2024.The Carbon Vapor Deposition (CVD) reactor is a technology developed by Honeywell Aerospace to convert methane, at high temperatures, into hydrogen and solid carbon. This element is coupled with a Sabatier reactor to support a closed loop environmental control and life support system with the aim of achieving nearly complete oxygen recovery (> 95%). Initial open loop, brassboard CVD reactor tests and simulations have shown its ability to achieve moderately high methane conversion and high hydrogen selectivity. However, in an integrated system, additional deficiencies are expected due to recycling of unreacted or extraneous species from the Sabatier reactor (e.g., carbon dioxide, hydrogen, water) and CVD reactor (e.g., hydrocarbons, methane, etc.). Sabatier and CVD reactor models were integrated and simulated to predict potential impacts to individual reactors� and overall system�s performance. The simulations showed that increasing the recycle of the CVD effluent hydrogen combined with decreasing the system inlet hydrogen flow rate (i.e., drawing a stoichiometric flow rate from an electrolyzer) can lead to an oxygen recovery of > 95%. However, system integration comes at a detriment to the individual reactors. The simulations show the initial conversion from the integrated system (Sabatier = 87% and CVD = 63%) to be lower than the standalone systems (Sabatier = 91% and CVD = 68%). Furthermore, transient simulations show substrate densification leading to worsening methane conversion coupled with increasing acetylene production, which is commensurate with soot formation. Simulations predict a shortening of the maintenance interval (i.e., time until CVD methane conversion drops below 50%) in the integrated system (Integrated = 110 hours vs Standalone = 275 hours), which would increase in the consumable substrate mass by ~2.5�. These analyses highlight the importance of long duration, integrated tests to corroborate these findings as well as suggest potential modifications (e.g., intermediate gas separations) to improve performance.application/pdfengECLSSCO2 ReductionKineticsReactorO2 RecoveryClosed-LoopPyrolysisChemical ModelingAir RevitalizationPresentations