2022-06-162022-06-1620179 Est. Plan. & Cmty. Prop. L. J. 191https://hdl.handle.net/2346/89522The first part of this article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of arbitration—a vehicle for avoiding litigation developed for the commercial world—in the realm of settling trust controversies. The second part of this article considers the impact of the Rachal opinion, as well as statutes in other jurisdictions that have recognized the use of such provisions. The third part addresses the particular limitations of mandatory arbitration in the context of resolving trust disputes. And the last part discusses the implementation of trust arbitration, both in terms of the summarizing the procedures set forth in the Texas Arbitration Act (TAA) and the drafting of the clause itself.engBinding arbitration in trust disputesTexas Arbitration ActTAAEfficacy of mandatory arbitration provisionsTrustsArbitrationAmerican Arbitration AssociationAAADrafting the mandatory arbitration provisions considerationsStandard arbitration clause for wills and non-commercial trustsACTEC Task Force ReportModel Simplified Trial Resolution ActRachal v. Reitz and the Efficacy and Implementation of Mandatory Arbitration Provisions in TrustsArticle