The Meaning of “Interrogation” Under Miranda v. Arizona
Date
1981
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Texas Tech Law Review
Abstract
Examines the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Rhode Island v. Innis. The Court held in that case that not all questions asked by police of persons in custody constitute interrogations, but rather those statements that are “reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.” The author believes this decision confuses the definition of interrogations which will require clarification from the courts.
Description
Keywords
Interrogations, Miranda warning, Statements, Evidence, Custody, Rhode Island v. Innis, Case note
Citation
12 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 725