The Houston Court of Appeals, 1st District, Adopts the Federal “Rule of Reason” for Vertical Nonprice Restraints: Red Wing Shoe Co. v. Shearer’s, Inc., 769 S.W.2d 339 (Tex. App. – Houston [1st Dist.] 1989, no writ)

Date

1990

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Texas Tech Law Review

Abstract

Analyzes the Texas case Red Wing Shoe Co. v. Shearer’s, Inc. The Houston Court of Appeals decided that Texas legislature, in enacting the Texas Free Enterprise and Antitrust Act of 1983, intended for the courts to adopt the federal rule of reason for vertical nonprice restraints such as the one in this case. This method requires the courts to consider the true economic effects of vertical agreements.

Description

Keywords

Rule of reason, Texas, Antitrust, Competition, Vertical agreements, Red Wing Shoe Co. v. Shearer’s, Inc., Texas Free Enterprise and Antitrust Act of 1983, Vertical nonprice restraints

Citation

21 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 787