Banking Law
| dc.creator | Hale, H. DeWayne | |
| dc.creator | Barnett, Sheli L. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-12T19:44:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-10-12T19:44:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1992 | |
| dc.description.abstract | During the survey period, June 1, 1990 through May 31, 1991, the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a number of banking law decisions. This article will focus upon four areas in which the appellate court ruled: the federal holder in due course doctrine, the assignment of rents clause in a Texas deed of trust, the applicability of D'Oench, Duhme/Section 1823(e) on a homestead claim and the notice required for a proper foreclosure sale of personal property. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | 23 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 99 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2346/88072 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Texas Tech Law Review | en_US |
| dc.subject | Fifth Circuit | en_US |
| dc.subject | Banking law | en_US |
| dc.subject | Federal holder in due course doctrine | en_US |
| dc.subject | Non-negotiable instruments | en_US |
| dc.subject | Assignment of rents clause | en_US |
| dc.subject | Texas deed of trust | en_US |
| dc.subject | D'Oench, Duhme doctrine | en_US |
| dc.subject | 12 U.S.C. section 1823(e) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Homestead claim | en_US |
| dc.subject | Required notice for foreclosure sale of personal property | en_US |
| dc.subject | Survey | en_US |
| dc.title | Banking Law | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |