Abandonment of the Surface Destruction Test in Determining Ownership of Unnamed Minerals

Simple item page
dc.creatorDavis, Richard D., Jr.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-19T21:04:40Z
dc.date.available2019-11-19T21:04:40Z
dc.date.issued1984
dc.description.abstractIn Moser v. United States Steel Corp., the Texas Supreme Court abandoned the surface destruction test for determining the inclusion on unnamed minerals in the severed mineral estate. The Court instead adopted the “ordinary and natural meaning test” and found that uranium was a mineral within the ordinary and natural meaning of the word. Thus, a severance of a mineral interest that included “oil, gas, and other minerals” would include uranium.en_US
dc.identifier.citation15 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 699en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/85478
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectSurface destruction testen_US
dc.subjectOrdinary and natural meaning testen_US
dc.subjectMineral interesten_US
dc.subjectSeveranceen_US
dc.subjectUraniumen_US
dc.subjectDeeden_US
dc.subjectOil and gasen_US
dc.subjectMineralsen_US
dc.subjectMoser v. United States Steel Corp.en_US
dc.subjectCase noteen_US
dc.titleAbandonment of the Surface Destruction Test in Determining Ownership of Unnamed Mineralsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
38_15TexTechLRev699(1984).pdf
Size:
1.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Texas Tech Law Review