Postmortem Sperm Retrieval and the Social Security Administration: How Modern Reproductive Technology Makes Strange Bedfellows
Date
2009
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Estate Planning & Community Property Law Journal
Abstract
As science and technology continues to evolve, the law must do so as well. However, the law almost always lags behind. This is certainly true concerning Postmortem Sperm Retrieval and the status of a child as a decedent if they are conceived after a father has died. A major point of focus is if the child qualifies as a dependent child who can receive social security benefits from their deceased father. Courts traditionally have varied on this issue and only a few states have adopted legislation addressing this concern. This article looks at both Gillert-Netting v. Barnhart and Vernoff v. Astrue cases and their ramifications in the Ninth Circuit.
Description
Rights
Availability
Keywords
Decedent, Dependent, Inheritance, Parentage, Postmortem sperm retrieval, PMSR, Social Security benefits, Vernoff v. Astrue, Gillett-Netting v. Barnhart, California, Arizonia, Ninth circuit
Citation
2 EST. PLAN. & COMMUNITY PROP. L.J. 33