Adoption of a Flexible Duty Standard Under Rule 10b-5
dc.creator | Greenhaw, David | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-13T20:09:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-13T20:09:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1974 | |
dc.description.abstract | Discusses duty imposed by the 10b-5 rule in securities regulations. It also discusses to what extent the 10b-5 rule imposes a duty. The author observes the 9th Circuit’s choice to a new approach that rejects the defendant’s state of mind of theory, which has been the traditional route of rule 10b-5. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | 6 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 293 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2346/82190 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Texas Tech Law Review | en_US |
dc.subject | Rule 10b-5 | en_US |
dc.subject | Securities regulations | en_US |
dc.subject | State of mind | en_US |
dc.subject | Flexible duty standard | en_US |
dc.subject | White v. Abrams | en_US |
dc.subject | Case note | en_US |
dc.title | Adoption of a Flexible Duty Standard Under Rule 10b-5 | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Securities Regulation – Adoption of a Flexible Duty Standard Under Rule 10b-5 | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |