Direct Payment of Vested Firemen’s Relief and Retirement Fund Benefits to Non-Member Spouse on Division of Community Property Pursuant to Divorce is Permissible
dc.creator | Swann, Tommy J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-26T19:04:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-26T19:04:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1977 | |
dc.description.abstract | Analyses the Texas Court of Civil Appeals for Beaumont’s case Collida v. Collida. The court in this case held that, upon divorce, a spouse was entitle to one-half of the other spouse’s interest in a “Firemen’s Relief and Retirement Fund,” over objections that fund’s spendthrift provision applied. Direct payments will help ensure that the nonmember will receive the benefits to which he or she is entitled. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | 9 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 173 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2346/85112 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Texas Tech Law Review | en_US |
dc.subject | Spendthrift | en_US |
dc.subject | Community property | en_US |
dc.subject | Divorce | en_US |
dc.subject | Firemen’s Relief and Retirement Fund | en_US |
dc.subject | Collida v. Collida | en_US |
dc.subject | Case note | en_US |
dc.title | Direct Payment of Vested Firemen’s Relief and Retirement Fund Benefits to Non-Member Spouse on Division of Community Property Pursuant to Divorce is Permissible | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Marital Property—Direct Payment of Vested Firemen’s Relief and Retirement Fund Benefits to Non-Member Spouse on Division of Community Property Pursuant to Divorce is Permissible | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |