Evaluation of Carcass Performance and Biomarkers Associated with Liver Abscess
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The inestimable economic loss in carcass value and feedlot performance associated with liver abscess in feedlot cattle has become a prominent and troublesome issue due to the multifactorial, sub-clinical nature of this disease. The first objective of this study was to determine the effects of liver abscess presence and severity on beef × dairy crossbred heifers on growth performance and carcass characteristics, while the second objective of this study was to investigation potential blood-based biomarkers for live-animal detection of liver abscess. A total of 1,984 beef × dairy heifers (initial body weight [BW] = 334.8 ± 4.6 kg) were assessed in a prospective cohort study. Treatment comparisons were assorted based on liver scores at time of harvest as follows: 1) non-abscessed (0); 2) 1 to 2 small abscesses (A-); 3) multiple small abscesses or 1 to 2 large abscesses (A); 4) and multiple large abscesses, open abscess, or signs of gut pile and/or diaphragm adherence (A+). Heifers (N = 200) which fit the treatment description (0 = 110; Abscessed [A-, A, or A+] = 97) had liver weights recorded and blood samples collected at harvest for modeling of potential predictors of the liver abscess condition. The experimental design, a prospective cohort study, used animal as experimental unit and included fixed effects of liver score and random effects of sorted pen (n = 30) nested within harvest dates (n = 9). For carcass outcomes by liver score and abscess size, results indicated hindered carcass performance in heifers with severe abscess (A+ or large abscess). Heifers scored as A+ yielded an economic loss of $70.51/hd in overall carcass value (sum of by-product and carcass pricing). While the live-animal performance of these same heifers also indicated the greatest hinderance in performance was associated most with heifers with sever abscess (A+ or large abscess), where the largest majority of cattle with severe abscess gained less than 0.45 kg per day (P = 0.02). Furthermore, liver weight was affected by liver abscess, with A+ scores weighing as much as 1kg or more than healthy livers (0; P < 0.01). In a binary system (abscessed or not), heifers with liver abscess had lesser values of LYM and WBC concentration (P < 0.01) but elevated PLR (P < 0.01). Serum chemistry measures were not affected by abscess presence or liver score (severity; P ≥ 0.06). In univariate modeling of CBC measures, only WBC concentration was accurate (65.85%; P < 0.01); however, not deemed an acceptable biomarker due to its’ poor specificity (54.79%). Using machine learning algorithms for modeling abscess condition, the LogitBoost model produced the greatest accuracy (80.65%; P < 0.01) and specificity (85.71%). An accurate blood test that allows for the detection of liver abscess during the finishing phase may allow for therapeutic management or alternative marketing of cattle; however, the marginal accuracy demonstrated in this study combined with the impracticality and cost of analyzing a blood sample may not be feasible. Regardless, the most explanatory CBC variables in cattle with abscessed livers were suggestive of an immune response. Overall, both late live-animal performance and carcass outcomes were negatively impacted by liver abscess in beef × dairy heifers and induced economic losses as much as $70.51/hd. Minor response in serum chemistry occurs as a result of liver abscess, while immune response measures including LYM and WBC should be further explored.