“Secular Humanism” as an “Established Religion”: A Response to Whitehead and Conlan

dc.creatorDavidow, Robert P.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-14T18:31:52Z
dc.date.available2019-10-14T18:31:52Z
dc.date.issued1979
dc.description.abstractCritiques an article published in the Winter 1978 issue of the Texas Tech Law Review about the evolution of the concept of religion in the decisions of the United States Supreme Court. The author says that the article is incomplete in its analysis of Supreme Court cases, contains factual inaccuracies and ill-founded assumptions, and omits any discussion of a possible solution to the perceived problem. The author concludes that the previous article does not recognize the spirit of toleration manifested in both the speech and religion clauses of the first amendment.en_US
dc.identifier.citation11 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 51en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/85229
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectReligionen_US
dc.subjectSecular humanismen_US
dc.subjectMarket place of ideasen_US
dc.subjectSupreme Courten_US
dc.subjectFree speechen_US
dc.subjectFreedom of religionen_US
dc.subjectReligious pluralismen_US
dc.subjectThe Establishment of the Religion of Secular Humanism and Its First Amendment Implicationsen_US
dc.subject10 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 1 (1978)en_US
dc.title“Secular Humanism” as an “Established Religion”: A Response to Whitehead and Conlanen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
09_11TexTechLRev51(1979-1980).pdf
Size:
520.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: