Success Factors in Human Space Programs - Why Did Apollo Succeed Better Than Later Programs?
| dc.creator | Jones, Harry W. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-10-21T17:48:50Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-10-21T17:48:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-07-12 | |
| dc.description | Bellevue, Washington | |
| dc.description | Harry W. Jones, NASA Ames Research Center, USA | |
| dc.description | The 45th International Conference on Environmental Systems was held in Bellevue, Washington, USA on 12 July 2015 through 16 July 2015. | |
| dc.description.abstract | The Apollo Program reached the moon, but the Constellation Program (CxP) that planned to return to the moon and go on to Mars was cancelled. Apollo is NASA’s greatest achievement but its success is poorly understood. The usual explanation is that President Kennedy announced we were going to the moon, the scientific community and the public strongly supported it, and Congress provided the necessary funding. This is partially incorrect and does not actually explain Apollo’s success. The scientific community and the public did not support Apollo. Like Apollo, Constellation was announced by a president and funded by Congress, with elements that continued on even after it was cancelled. Two other factors account for Apollo’s success. Initially, the surprise event of Uri Gagarin’s first human space flight created political distress and a strong desire for the government to dramatically demonstrate American space capability. Options were considered and Apollo was found to be most effective and technically feasible. Political necessity overrode both the lack of popular and scientific support and the extremely high cost and risk. Other NASA human space programs were either canceled, such as the Space Exploration Initiative (SEI), repeatedly threatened with cancellation, such as International Space Station (ISS), or terminated while still operational, such as the space shuttle and even Apollo itself. Large crash programs such as Apollo are initiated and continued if and only if urgent political necessity produces the necessary political will. They succeed if and only if they are technically feasible within the provided resources. Future human space missions will probably require gradual step-by-step development in a more normal environment. | en_US |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.other | ICES-2015-048 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2346/64317 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | 45th International Conference on Environmental Systems | en_US |
| dc.title | Success Factors in Human Space Programs - Why Did Apollo Succeed Better Than Later Programs? | en_US |
| dc.type | Presentation | en_US |