Securities Law
dc.creator | Zanglein, Jayne | |
dc.creator | Myhra, Alison | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-26T18:48:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-26T18:48:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1992 | |
dc.description.abstract | During the survey period, the Fifth Circuit did not make any significant advances into previously uncharted areas of securities law. This article will not examine every securities case issued during the survey period. Instead, we will focus on those cases, which presented interesting issues. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | 23 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 377 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2346/88154 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Texas Tech Law Review | en_US |
dc.subject | Securities law | en_US |
dc.subject | Duties owed by commodity brokers to customers | en_US |
dc.subject | Failure to provide options disclosure documents | en_US |
dc.subject | Liability | en_US |
dc.subject | Statute of limitations for 10b-5 actions | en_US |
dc.subject | Nondisclosure of entrenchment devices in proxy fights | en_US |
dc.subject | Waiver of intrastate exemption | en_US |
dc.subject | Attorneys’ fees awards in shareholder derivative actions | en_US |
dc.subject | Fifth Circuit | en_US |
dc.title | Securities Law | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |