Securities Law

dc.creatorZanglein, Jayne
dc.creatorMyhra, Alison
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-26T18:48:07Z
dc.date.available2021-10-26T18:48:07Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.description.abstractDuring the survey period, the Fifth Circuit did not make any significant advances into previously uncharted areas of securities law. This article will not examine every securities case issued during the survey period. Instead, we will focus on those cases, which presented interesting issues.en_US
dc.identifier.citation23 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 377en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/88154
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectSecurities lawen_US
dc.subjectDuties owed by commodity brokers to customersen_US
dc.subjectFailure to provide options disclosure documentsen_US
dc.subjectLiabilityen_US
dc.subjectStatute of limitations for 10b-5 actionsen_US
dc.subjectNondisclosure of entrenchment devices in proxy fightsen_US
dc.subjectWaiver of intrastate exemptionen_US
dc.subjectAttorneys’ fees awards in shareholder derivative actionsen_US
dc.subjectFifth Circuiten_US
dc.titleSecurities Lawen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
23_23TexTechLRev377(1992).pdf
Size:
1.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: