Absent Creditor Reliance, A Limited Partner Who Is a Director of the Corporate General Partner Is Not Personally Liable for Partnership Obligations

Simple item page
dc.creatorGreenhaw, David
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-13T20:03:30Z
dc.date.available2018-11-13T20:03:30Z
dc.date.issued1975
dc.description.abstractDiscusses the increase in use of limited partnerships with corporate general partner. This increase is due in part because of the advantages associated with such an arrangement. The author proves this by listing pros and cons of the limited partnership.en_US
dc.identifier.citation6 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 1171en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/82188
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectTexas Uniform Limited Partnershipen_US
dc.subjectULPAen_US
dc.subjectLimited partnershipen_US
dc.subjectCorporationsen_US
dc.subjectGeneral partnershipen_US
dc.subjectSole proprietorshipen_US
dc.subjectDelaney v. Fidelity Lease Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectCase noteen_US
dc.titleAbsent Creditor Reliance, A Limited Partner Who Is a Director of the Corporate General Partner Is Not Personally Liable for Partnership Obligationsen_US
dc.title.alternativeLimited Partnerships – Absent Creditor Reliance, A Limited Partner Who Is a Director of the Corporate General Partner Is Not Personally Liable for Partnership Obligationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
71_6TexTechLRev1171(1974-1975).pdf
Size:
366.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Texas Tech Law Review