2014 Oil & Gas Law Update

Date

2014

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Texas Tech Law Review

Abstract

This Article surveys oil and gas case law in the calendar year of 2014. Examines significant cases and presiding law in various districts and federal courts throughout the state of Texas.

Description

Keywords

Key Operating & Equipment, Inc. v. Hegar, Chesapeake Exploration, LLC v. Hyder, Rippy Interests, LLC v. Nash, Lamont v. Vaquillas Energy Lopeno Ltd., Lightning Oil Co. v. Anadarko E & P Onshore, LLC, Forest Oil Corp. v. El Rucio Land & Cattle Co., Cade v. Cosgrove, Warren v. Chesapeake Exploration, LLC, Breton Energy, L.L.C. v. Mariner Energy Res., Inc., Alliance Pipeline L.P. v. 4.360 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the S/2 of Section 29, Township 163 North, Range 85 West, Renville County, North Dakota, Rodriguez v. Krancer, Cooperstown Holstein Corp. v. Town of Middlefield, Norse Energy Corp. USA v. Town of Dryden, Hess Corp. v. ENI Petroleum US, LLC, In re Johnson, Windsor Energy Group, LLC v. Noble Energy, Inc., High Country Conservation Advocates v. U.S. Forest Service

Citation

Christopher Kulander, 2014 Oil & Gas Law Update, 47 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 661 (2014-2015)