Why the Supreme Court Will Not Take Pretrial Right to Counsel Seriously

Simple item page
dc.creatorLoewy, Arnold H.
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-14T18:30:29Z
dc.date.available2021-10-14T18:30:29Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractImplicit in the title of this paper is the assumption that the Supreme Court does not take the pretrial right to counsel seriously. After establishing that, attempts to ascertain why.en_US
dc.identifier.citationArnold H. Loewy, Why the Supreme Court Will Not Take Pretrial Right to Counsel Seriously, 45 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 267 (2012-2013)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/88105
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectRight to counselen_US
dc.subjectPretrial right to counselen_US
dc.subjectFifth Amendmenten_US
dc.subjectEscobedo v. Illinoisen_US
dc.subjectMiranda v. Arizonaen_US
dc.subjectSelf-incriminationen_US
dc.subjectSixth Amendmenten_US
dc.subjectIndictment, arraignment, and preliminary hearingen_US
dc.titleWhy the Supreme Court Will Not Take Pretrial Right to Counsel Seriouslyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Texas Tech Law Review