A critical account on the automated SEM-EDS usage in ceramic analyses giving the example of prehistoric pottery from the site of Petit-Chasseur, Western Switzerland

Simple item page
dc.creatorCarloni, Delia
dc.creatorŠegvić, Branimir (TTU)
dc.creatorZanoni, Giovanni (TTU)
dc.creatorSartori, Mario
dc.creatorBesse, Marie
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-24T19:04:04Z
dc.date.available2022-10-24T19:04:04Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description© 2022. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses the pros and cons of the application of automated SEM-EDS analysis to the characterization of pottery findings by means of a thorough discussion of the basics of its technology as well as its use in archaeometric research. An in-depth investigation of coarse prehistoric pottery (42 thin sections) from the Petit-Chasseur necropolis (3100-1600 BC, Southwestern Switzerland) provided the perfect testing ground for automated SEM-EDS analysis and resulted in a complete and updated reflection on the capabilities and limitations of this method. An opportunity to produce a quick, reliable, automated, and in-depth petrographic characterization of archaeological ceramics in the form of detailed phase maps stands as a unique feature of automated SEM-EDS technology. Indeed, the information on the composition of aplastic inclusions and clayey groundmass along with the insights on void distribution offer a great resource enabling inferences on raw material choices/provenance and manufacturing technology. However, the present study exposed there are more disadvantages than the ones reported by the literature. A phase identification ignoring crystallographic particularities whatsoever is potentially alarming for mineral sorting, whereas the simplification of lithoclast’s internal texture hampers the lithological classification of aplastic inclusions. Notwithstanding listed limitations, the use of automated SEM-EDS in archaeometric research of pottery offers a wealth of useful data which will secure its place in any future investigation of archaeological materials, alongside with the more traditional techniques such as optical petrography, regular scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCarloni, D., Šegvić, B., Zanoni, G., Sartori, M., & Besse, M. (2022). A critical account on the automated SEM-EDS usage in ceramic analyses giving the example of prehistoric pottery from the site of Petit-Chasseur, Western Switzerland. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 22(2). Retrieved from: http://www.maajournal.com/Issues2022b.phpen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.maajournal.com/Issues2022b.php
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/90299
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectAutomated Mineralogyen_US
dc.subjectQEMSCAN®en_US
dc.subjectCeramic Characterizationen_US
dc.subjectPottery Analysisen_US
dc.subjectArchaeometryen_US
dc.subjectApplied Material Scienceen_US
dc.subjectSEM-EDSen_US
dc.subjectX-Ray Diffractionen_US
dc.subjectOptical Microscopyen_US
dc.titleA critical account on the automated SEM-EDS usage in ceramic analyses giving the example of prehistoric pottery from the site of Petit-Chasseur, Western Switzerlanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
segvic_article.pdf
Size:
2.63 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article with TTU Libraries cover page
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Faculty Research